Best Practices in Peer Review (Infographic)
    November 2023
Based on the Review Quality Assurance (RQA) processFootnote *, CIHR would like to share a list of review quality issues that were identified and should be avoided in peer review.
| Comments by reviewers to avoid | Guidance | 
|---|---|
| Using gendered language | Use gender-neutral pronouns or gender-inclusive phrases: “they” or “the applicant”, instead of “she” or “he” | 
| Eligibility concerns | Flag to CIHR staff. | 
| Missing attachments | Inform CIHR staff as soon as possible so they can investigate. | 
| “Should not be funded” | Do not include funding recommendations in reviews. | 
| Number of publications or research grants to assess productivity (in isolation) | Consider a broad range of research contributions and impacts. | 
| Journal-based metrics | Focus on scientific content or quality of impacts. | 
| Sharing committee panel information | Committee membership lists are confidential / published on the CIHR website 60 days after the funding decision. | 
Please see CIHR's Conducting Quality Reviews learning module for additional guidance related to review quality.
- Date modified: